Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772392›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Image-Based Detection of Modifications in Assembled PCBs with Deep Convolutional Autoencoders.

Diulhio Candido de Oliveira, Bogdan Tomoyuki Nassu, Marco Aurelio Wehrmeister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diulhio Candido de OliveiraDepartament of Informatics, Federal University of Technology-Parana (UTFPR), Curitiba 80230-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-6208
Bogdan Tomoyuki NassuDepartament of Informatics, Federal University of Technology-Parana (UTFPR), Curitiba 80230-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-8543
Marco Aurelio WehrmeisterDepartament of Informatics, Federal University of Technology-Parana (UTFPR), Curitiba 80230-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1415-5527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a one-class learning approach for detecting modifications in assembled printed circuit boards (PCBs) based on photographs taken without tight control over perspective and illumination conditions. Anomaly detection and segmentation are essential for several applications, where collecting anomalous samples for supervised training is infeasible. Given the uncontrolled environment and the huge number of possible modifications, we address the problem as a case of anomaly detection, proposing an approach that is directed towards the characteristics of that scenario, while being well suited for other similar applications. We propose a loss function that can be used to train a deep convolutional autoencoder based only on images of the unmodified board-which allows overcoming the challenge of producing a representative set of samples containing anomalies for supervised learning. We also propose a function that explores higher-level features for comparing the input image and the reconstruction produced by the autoencoder, allowing the segmentation of structures and components that differ between them. Experiments performed on a dataset built to represent real-world situations (which we made publicly available) show that our approach outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches for anomaly segmentation in the considered scenario, while producing comparable results on a more general object anomaly detection task.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionautoencoderdeep learningmanufacturevisual inspection

Identifiers

PMID36772392
PMCPMC9921794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.