ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
The Properties of a Ship's Compass in the Context of Ship Manoeuvrability.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In evaluating the accuracy of most navigation measuring systems, it is accepted, as a rule, that measurement errors are characterised by a normal distribution. With reference to the compass, the approach of most producers is similar. However, in the case of this measuring device, the dynamics of the ship should also be taken into account. The problem is that any changes in the ship's heading can be measured exclusively with the use of a compass. Until quite recently, this device was built based on mechanical elements, so it possessed its own dynamic properties. This means the appearance of specific, positive feedback (self-reinforcing feedback) because if the compass did not point to the correct heading, it could lead the ship to stray from the correct heading. On the other hand, it could mean an incorrect compass setup, even though the ship had the correct heading. Any incorrect indications of the compass were then interpreted as a ship's departure from the correct heading. This problem was not essential in the era of magnetic compasses because the errors in these compasses are relatively constant, unlike the errors in gyrocompasses, which have an oscillatory and random character and, thus, it is not possible to describe them accurately with mathematical relations. This issue was already perceived before WWII, when the Anschutz Company proposed, among other solutions, using the so-called Schuler period in the construction of gyrocompasses. Fibre optic gyrocompasses do not possess mechanical sensors, so the variability of their indications is of a different character. However, computational processes, as well as applied inertial sensors, also cause certain errors of an oscillatory nature. This raises the following questions: what is the spectrum of the error frequency of such compasses, and what is the influence of the ship's movement on them? The authors attempted to evaluate this phenomenon by performing measurements made on board three hydrographic platforms and comparing them with the headings indicated by other compasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.