Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772207›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique.

Baiju Babu Vimala, Saravanan Srinivasan, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, Venkatesan Muthukumaran, Jyothi Chinna Babu, Norbert Herencsar, Lucia Vilcekova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Baiju Babu VimalaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Saravanan SrinivasanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7884-3532
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-1197
Venkatesan MuthukumaranDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-5596
Jyothi Chinna BabuDepartment of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Rajampet 516126, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9005-0615
Norbert HerencsarDepartment of Telecommunications, Faculty of Electrical and Communication Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9504-2275
Lucia VilcekovaFaculty of Management, Comenius University Bratislava, Odbojarov 10, 820 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid improvements in ultrasound imaging technology have made it much more useful for screening and diagnosing breast problems. Local-speckle-noise destruction in ultrasound breast images may impair image quality and impact observation and diagnosis. It is crucial to remove localized noise from images. In the article, we have used the hybrid deep learning technique to remove local speckle noise from breast ultrasound images. The contrast of ultrasound breast images was first improved using logarithmic and exponential transforms, and then guided filter algorithms were used to enhance the details of the glandular ultrasound breast images. In order to finish the pre-processing of ultrasound breast images and enhance image clarity, spatial high-pass filtering algorithms were used to remove the extreme sharpening. In order to remove local speckle noise without sacrificing the image edges, edge-sensitive terms were eventually added to the Logical-Pool Recurrent Neural Network (LPRNN). The mean square error and false recognition rate both fell below 1.1% at the hundredth training iteration, showing that the LPRNN had been properly trained. Ultrasound images that have had local speckle noise destroyed had signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) greater than 65 dB, peak SNR ratios larger than 70 dB, edge preservation index values greater than the experimental threshold of 0.48, and quick destruction times. The time required to destroy local speckle noise is low, edge information is preserved, and image features are brought into sharp focus.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSignal-To-Noise RatioUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Mammaryglandular ultrasound imagehybrid deep learning techniquelocal speckle noise destructionlogical-pool recurrent neural networksignal-to-noise ratiospatial high-pass filter

Identifiers

PMID36772207
PMCPMC9920830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.