ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An effective image despeckling and reconstruction approach using U-Net based model and comparative analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of ultrasound radiomic features in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Kidney and Gallbladder Stones by Texture Analysis Using Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Based on Diagnostic Ultrasound Images.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Progress in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Assisted Medical Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Roles of olive oil and physical exercise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after ultrasound-based evaluation.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional visualization of thyroid ultrasound images based on multi-scale features fusion and hierarchical attention.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Multimodal Biomedical Image Segmentation using Multi-Dimensional U-Convolutional Neural Network.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Multimodal hybrid convolutional neural network based brain tumor grade classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Classification Using Synthesized Deep Learning Model with Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Framework of Faster CRNN and VGG16-Enhanced Region Proposal Network for Detection and Grade Classification of Knee RA.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid improvements in ultrasound imaging technology have made it much more useful for screening and diagnosing breast problems. Local-speckle-noise destruction in ultrasound breast images may impair image quality and impact observation and diagnosis. It is crucial to remove localized noise from images. In the article, we have used the hybrid deep learning technique to remove local speckle noise from breast ultrasound images. The contrast of ultrasound breast images was first improved using logarithmic and exponential transforms, and then guided filter algorithms were used to enhance the details of the glandular ultrasound breast images. In order to finish the pre-processing of ultrasound breast images and enhance image clarity, spatial high-pass filtering algorithms were used to remove the extreme sharpening. In order to remove local speckle noise without sacrificing the image edges, edge-sensitive terms were eventually added to the Logical-Pool Recurrent Neural Network (LPRNN). The mean square error and false recognition rate both fell below 1.1% at the hundredth training iteration, showing that the LPRNN had been properly trained. Ultrasound images that have had local speckle noise destroyed had signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) greater than 65 dB, peak SNR ratios larger than 70 dB, edge preservation index values greater than the experimental threshold of 0.48, and quick destruction times. The time required to destroy local speckle noise is low, edge information is preserved, and image features are brought into sharp focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.