Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772190›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A Review.

Lubna Luxmi Dhirani, Noorain Mukhtiar, Bhawani Shankar Chowdhry, Thomas Newe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Audiovisual recordings of patients: developing an ethical guideline in Iran.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lubna Luxmi DhiraniDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-4117
Noorain MukhtiarDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan.
Bhawani Shankar ChowdhryDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4340-9602
Thomas NeweDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3375-8200

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 16/RC/3918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industry 5.0 is projected to be an exemplary improvement in digital transformation allowing for mass customization and production efficiencies using emerging technologies such as universal machines, autonomous and self-driving robots, self-healing networks, cloud data analytics, etc., to supersede the limitations of Industry 4.0. To successfully pave the way for acceptance of these technologies, we must be bound and adhere to ethical and regulatory standards. Presently, with ethical standards still under development, and each region following a different set of standards and policies, the complexity of being compliant increases. Having vague and inconsistent ethical guidelines leaves potential gray areas leading to privacy, ethical, and data breaches that must be resolved. This paper examines the ethical dimensions and dilemmas associated with emerging technologies and provides potential methods to mitigate their legal/regulatory issues.

Indexed as

cybersecurityemerging technologiesethicsprivacyregulationsstandards

Identifiers

PMID36772190
PMCPMC9921682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.