ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Multi-Class Classification and Multi-Output Regression of Three-Dimensional Objects Using Artificial Intelligence Applied to Digital Holographic Information.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital holographically sensed 3D data processing, which is useful for AI-based vision, is demonstrated. Three prominent methods of learning from datasets such as sensed holograms, computationally retrieved intensity and phase from holograms forming concatenated intensity-phase (whole information) images, and phase-only images (depth information) were utilized for the proposed multi-class classification and multi-output regression tasks of the chosen 3D objects in supervised learning. Each dataset comprised 2268 images obtained from the chosen eighteen 3D objects. The efficacy of our approaches was validated on experimentally generated digital holographic data then further quantified and compared using specific evaluation matrices. The machine learning classifiers had better AUC values for different classes on the holograms and whole information datasets compared to the CNN, whereas the CNN had a better performance on the phase-only image dataset compared to these classifiers. The MLP regressor was found to have a stable prediction in the test and validation sets with a fixed EV regression score of 0.00 compared to the CNN, the other regressors for holograms, and the phase-only image datasets, whereas the RF regressor showed a better performance in the validation set for the whole information dataset with a fixed EV regression score of 0.01 compared to the CNN and other regressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.