Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772051›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification-Effect of Temperature.

Daniel Díaz-Perete, Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez, Luís Carmo-Calado, Cristina Martín-Doñate, Julio Terrados-Cepeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Díaz-PereteDepartment of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Manuel Jesús Hermoso-OrzáezDepartment of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-3233
Luís Carmo-CaladoIPPortalegre-Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-4433
Cristina Martín-DoñateDepartment of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5380-4983
Julio Terrados-CepedaDepartment of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1720-7545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the polymeric materials used in the most common 3D printers is poly(ethylene terephthalate) glycol (PETG). It represents, in world terms, around 2.3% of polymeric raw material used in additive manufacturing. However, after processing this material, its properties change irreversibly. A significant amount of waste is produced around the world, and its disposal is usually destined for landfill or incineration, which can generate an important issue due to the high environmental risks. Polymer waste from 3D printing, hereinafter 3DPPW, has a relatively high calorific value and adequate characteristics to be valued in thermochemical processes. Gasification emerges as an innovative and alternative solution for recovering energy from 3DPPW, mixed with residues of lignocellulosic origin, and presents some environmental advantages compared to other types of thermochemical treatments, since the gasification process releases smaller amounts of NOx into the atmosphere, SOx, and CO

Indexed as

3D print waste recoveryFDMIndustry 4.0plastic materialspolymersthermochemical processwaste to energy

Identifiers

PMID36772051
PMCPMC9920420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.