ArticlePolymers2023
Influence of Ionizing Radiation on Fluoride-Releasing Dental Restorative Materials.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance of alkasite and glass-hybrid restorations compared with resin composite in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Effect of photon radiotherapy on microleakage and microhardness of nanohybrid resin composite restoration: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of fractionated therapeutic radiotherapy on surface microhardness and roughness of giomer- and ormocer-based restorative composites: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Water Absorption and Solubility of Fluoride-Based Restorative Materials Exposed to Ionizing Radiation.Polymers · 2025Article
- Influence of Time Interval, Temperature, and Storage Condition on Fluoride Release and Recharge from Silorane-Based Restorative Materials.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Terrestrial radiotherapy alters microhardness and surface micromorphology of dental restorative materials: anFrontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Interfacial assessment of cention forte vs. equia forte and two forms of calcium silicate cements at two time intervals.BDJ open · 2024Article
- The damage and remineralization strategies of dental hard tissues following radiotherapy.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Effect of radiotherapy on the surface roughness and microhardness of contemporary bioactive restorative materials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of radiotherapy on the mechanical, chemical, and surface properties of two recently introduced restorative dental materials (a glass hybrid and an alkasite), while two conventional restorative materials served as references. Material specimens of the experimental groups (irradiated) were compared to the specimens of the control groups that underwent the same preparation procedure but without irradiation. The experimental groups of restorative material specimens were irradiated with a total of 70 Gy over 35 days (2 Gy/day × 35 days), while the control groups received no treatment. The following properties were evaluated: surface microhardness (Vickers), surface roughness, color change, flexural strength, flexural modulus, material reliability, and infrared spectra. For the experimental groups, measurements were performed 24 h after specimen preparation, i.e., before radiotherapy and after the completion of the irradiation protocol. For the control groups, measurements were performed after the corresponding periods of no treatment. A statistically significant increase in microhardness (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.