Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36771916›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

Mechanical Properties and Durability of Geopolymer Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Review.

Peng Zhang, Xiaoyao Sun, Fei Wang, Juan Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Construction and demolition waste framework of circular economy: A mini review.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Substantial Copper (CuPolymers · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peng ZhangYellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-3357
Xiaoyao SunYellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Fei WangYellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Juan WangYellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278283National Natural Science Foundation of China U2040224Natural Science Foundation of Henan of China 212300410018Project Special Funding of Yellow River Laboratory YRL22LT02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete (GPRAC) is a new type of green material with broad application prospects by replacing ordinary Portland cement with geopolymer and natural aggregates with recycled aggregates. This paper summarizes the research about the mechanical properties, durability, and microscopic aspects of GPRAC. The reviewed contents include compressive strength, elastic modulus, flexural strength, splitting tensile strength, freeze-thaw resistance, abrasion resistance, sulfate corrosion resistance, and chloride penetration resistance. It is found that GPRAC can be made to work better by changing the curing temperature, using different precursor materials, adding fibers and nanoparticles, and setting optimal mix ratios. Among them, using multiple precursor materials in synergy tended to show better performance compared to a single precursor material. In addition, using modified recycled aggregates, the porosity and water absorption decreased by 18.97% and 25.33%, respectively, and the apparent density was similar to that of natural aggregates. The current results show that the performance of GPRAC can meet engineering requirements. In addition, compared with traditional concrete, the use of GPRAC can effectively reduce carbon emissions, energy loss, and environmental pollution, which is in line with the concept of green and low-carbon development in modern society. In general, GPRAC has good prospects and development space. This paper reviews the effects of factors such as recycled aggregate admixture and curing temperature on the performance of GPRAC, which helps to optimize the ratio design and curing conditions, as well as provide guidance for the application of recycled aggregate in geopolymer concrete, and also supply theoretical support for the subsequent application of GPRAC in practical engineering.

Indexed as

durabilitygeopolymermechanical propertiesmicrostructuresphysical propertiesrecycled aggregate

Identifiers

PMID36771916
PMCPMC9920236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.