ArticlePolymers2023
Direct Fabrication of Functional Shapes on 3D Surfaces Using Electrospinning.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geometric Analysis and Modeling of Electrospun Nanofiber Mat Deposition in a Top-Down Vertical Configuration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanical Properties of Dual-Layer Electrospun Fiber Mats.Polymers · 2025Article
- Structure, Properties and Degradation of Self-Assembled Fibrinogen Nanofiber Scaffolds.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate the ability to simultaneously pattern fibers and fabricate functional 2D and 3D shapes (e.g., letters, mask-like structures with nose bridges and ear loops, aprons, hoods) using a single step electrospinning process. Using 2D and 3D mesh templates, electrospun fibers were preferentially attracted to the metal protrusions relative to the voids so that the pattern of the electrospun mat mimicked the woven mesh macroscopically. On a microscopic scale, the electrostatic lensing effect decreased fiber diameter and narrowed the fiber size distribution, e.g., the coefficient of variation of the fiber diameter for sample collected on a 0.6 mm mesh was 14% compared to 55% for the sample collected on foil). Functionally, the mesh did not affect the wettability of the fiber mats. Notably, the fiber patterning increased the rigidity of the fiber mat. There was a 2-fold increase in flexural rigidity using the 0.6 mm mesh compared to the sample collected on foil. Overall, we anticipate this approach will be a versatile tool for design and fabrication of 2D and 3D patterns with potential applications in personalized wound care and surgical meshes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.