Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36771801›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Multi-Objective Optimization of Liquid Silica Array Lenses Based on Latin Hypercube Sampling and Constrained Generative Inverse Design Networks.

Hanjui Chang, Shuzhou Lu, Yue Sun, Guangyi Zhang, Longshi Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanjui ChangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0034-6303
Shuzhou LuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-8664
Yue SunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Guangyi ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Longshi RaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injection molding process parameters have a great impact on plastic production quality, manufacturing cost, and molding efficiency. This study proposes to apply the method of Latin hypercube sampling, and to combine the response surface model and "Constraint Generation Inverse Design Network (CGIDN)" to achieve multi-objective optimization of the injection process, shorten the time to find the optimal process parameters, and improve the production efficiency of plastic parts. Taking the LSR lens array of automotive LED lights as the research object, the residual stress and volume shrinkage were taken as the optimization objectives, and the filling time, melt temperature, maturation time, and maturation pressure were taken as the influencing factors to obtain the optimization target values, and the response surface models between the volume shrinkage rate and the influencing factors were established. Based on the "Constraint-Generated Inverse Design Network", the optimization was independently sought within the set parameters to obtain the optimal combination of process parameters to meet the injection molding quality of plastic parts. The results showed that the optimal residual stress value and volume shrinkage rate were 11.96 MPa and 4.88%, respectively, in the data set of 20 Latin test samples obtained based on Latin hypercube sampling, and the optimal residual stress value and volume shrinkage rate were 8.47 MPa and 2.83%, respectively, after optimization by the CGIDN method. The optimal process parameters obtained by CGIDN optimization were a melt temperature of 30 °C, filling time of 2.5 s, maturation pressure of 40 MPa, and maturation time of 15 s. The optimization results were obvious and showed the feasibility of the data-driven injection molding process optimization method based on the combination of Latin hypercube sampling and CGIDN.

Indexed as

constrained generative inverse design networkslatin hypercube samplingliquid optical silicone lensesparameter optimizationresidual stressvolume shrinkage

Identifiers

PMID36771801
PMCPMC9919705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.