Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36771396›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Relationship between Diet Quality and Maternal Stool Microbiota in the MUMS Australian Pregnancy Cohort.

Megan L Gow, Xin-Yi Chua, Emad El-Omar, Daniella Susic, Amanda Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Megan L GowThe University of Sydney Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Xin-Yi ChuaUNSW Microbiome Research Centre, St George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-1873
Emad El-OmarUNSW Microbiome Research Centre, St George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Daniella SusicDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia.
Amanda HenryDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7351-8922

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1158876St George and Sutherland Medical Research Foundation UNSW RG188959The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary intake during pregnancy may influence the antenatal microbiome, which is proposed to impact maternal and infant health during the pregnancy and beyond. The aim of this sub-study was to examine associations between dietary intake and microbiota diversity during pregnancy using whole metagenomic sequencing and examine associations in low-risk versus high-risk pregnancies, as well as complicated versus uncomplicated pregnancies. Pregnancy data were analysed from women participating in the MUMS cohort study in Sydney, Australia (women followed from trimester 1 of pregnancy to 1-year postpartum), who had dietary intake data at either trimester 1 or 3, assessed using the Australian Eating Survey, and a matched stool sample (

Indexed as

DietMicrobiotaAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancydiet qualitymicrobiotapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36771396
PMCPMC9920253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.