Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36771009›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Molecular Toxicity Virtual Screening Applying a Quantized Computational SNN-Based Framework.

Mauro Nascimben, Lia Rimondini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mauro NascimbenDepartment of Health Sciences, Center on Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases CAAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7123-5577
Lia RimondiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Center on Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases CAAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7785-2282

Funding

European Union 860462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking neural networks are biologically inspired machine learning algorithms attracting researchers' attention for their applicability to alternative energy-efficient hardware other than traditional computers. In the current work, spiking neural networks have been tested in a quantitative structure-activity analysis targeting the toxicity of molecules. Multiple public-domain databases of compounds have been evaluated with spiking neural networks, achieving accuracies compatible with high-quality frameworks presented in the previous literature. The numerical experiments also included an analysis of hyperparameters and tested the spiking neural networks on molecular fingerprints of different lengths. Proposing alternatives to traditional software and hardware for time- and resource-consuming tasks, such as those found in chemoinformatics, may open the door to new research and improvements in the field.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerComputersMachine LearningSoftwarein silico toxicity predictionmachine learningmolecular fingerprintsspiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID36771009
PMCPMC9919191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.