Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36770944›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Analysis of Single-Step Pretreatments for Lignocellulosic Platform Isolation as the Basis of Biorefinery Design.

Jhonny Alejandro Poveda-Giraldo, Maria Camila Garcia-Vallejo, Carlos Ariel Cardona Alzate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Special Issue "Lignocellulosic Biomass II".Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jhonny Alejandro Poveda-GiraldoInstitute of Biotechnology and Agribusiness, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Manizales, Manizales 170001, Colombia.
Maria Camila Garcia-VallejoInstitute of Biotechnology and Agribusiness, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Manizales, Manizales 170001, Colombia.
Carlos Ariel Cardona AlzateInstitute of Biotechnology and Agribusiness, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Manizales, Manizales 170001, Colombia.

Funding

Colciencias 80740-903-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biorefinery feasibility is highly influenced by the early design of the best feedstock transformation pathway to obtain value-added products. Pretreatment has been identified as the critical stage in biorefinery design since proper pretreatment influences subsequent reaction, separation, and purification processes. However, many pretreatment analyses have focused on preserving and valorizing six-carbon sugars for future use in bioconversion processes, leaving aside fractions such as hemicellulose and lignin. To date, there has been no pretreatment systematization for the removal of lignocellulosic fractions. This work defines pretreatment efficacy through operational, economic, environmental, and social indicators. Thus, using the data reported in the literature, as well as the results of the simulation schemes, a multi-criteria weighting of the best-performing schemes for the isolation or removal of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin was carried out. As a main result, it was concluded that dilute acid is the most effective for cellulose isolation and hemicellulose removal for producing platform products based on six- and five-carbon sugars, respectively. Additionally, the kraft process is the best methodology for lignin removal and its future use in biorefineries. The results of this work help to elucidate a methodological systematization of the pretreatment efficacy in the design of biorefineries as an early feasibility stage considering sustainability aspects.

Indexed as

CelluloseLigninBiomassHydrolysisSugarsCelluloseLigninlignocelluloseSugarsbiorefineriesheuristic analysislignocellulosic fractionationpretreatment efficacysocial impacttechno-economic analysis

Identifiers

PMID36770944
PMCPMC9921018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.