Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36770626›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Quality Control of Pesticide Residue Measurements and Evaluation of Their Results.

Árpád Ambrus, Vy Vy Ngoc Doan, Júlia Szenczi-Cseh, Henriett Szemánné-Dobrik, Adrienn Vásárhelyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Árpád AmbrusDoctoral School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-4596
Vy Vy Ngoc DoanSouthern Pesticide Control and Testing Center, Plant Protection Department, 71007 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Júlia Szenczi-CsehFreelancer Food Safety Adviser, 1116 Budapest, Hungary.
Henriett Szemánné-DobrikFood Chain Safety Centre, Non-profit Ltd., Pesticide Residue Analytical Laboratory, 3529 Miskolc, Hungary.
Adrienn VásárhelyiFood Chain Safety Laboratory Directorate, 1095 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticide residues are monitored in many countries around the world. The main aims of the programs are to provide data for dietary exposure assessment of consumers to pesticide residues and for verifying the compliance of the residue concentrations in food with the national or international maximum residue limits. Accurate residue data are required to reach valid conclusions in both cases. The validity of the analytical results can be achieved by the implementation of suitable quality control protocols during sampling and determination of pesticide residues. To enable the evaluation of the reliability of the results, it is not sufficient to test and report the recovery, linearity of calibration, the limit of detection/quantification, and MS detection conditions. The analysts should also pay attention to and possibly report the selection of the portion of sample material extracted and the residue components according to the purpose of the work, quality of calibration, accuracy of standard solutions, and reproducibility of the entire laboratory phase of the determination of pesticide residues. The sources of errors potentially affecting the measured residue values and the methods for controlling them are considered in this article.

Indexed as

Pesticide ResiduesFoodFood ContaminationQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsPesticide Residuespesticide residuesquality control proceduresreproducibility of resultssources of errors of residue analyses

Identifiers

PMID36770626
PMCPMC9920035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.