Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36770159›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Phosphorous- and Boron-Doped Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Energy-Related Applications.

Manpreet Kaur Ubhi, Manpreet Kaur, Jaspreet Kaur Grewal, Virender K Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manpreet Kaur UbhiDepartment of Chemistry, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
Manpreet KaurDepartment of Chemistry, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3637-7681
Jaspreet Kaur GrewalDepartment of Chemistry, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
Virender K SharmaProgram for the Environment and Sustainability, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 112 Adriance Road, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-8675

Funding

University Grants Commission BININ01682429 A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doping is a great strategy for tuning the characteristics of graphene-based nanomaterials. Phosphorous has a higher electronegativity as compared to carbon, whereas boron can induce p-type conductivity in graphene. This review provides insight into the different synthesis routes of phosphorous- and boron-doped graphene along with their applications in supercapacitors, lithium- ions batteries, and cells such as solar and fuel cells. The two major approaches for the synthesis, viz. direct and post-treatment methods, are discussed in detail. The former synthetic strategies include ball milling and chemical vapor discharge approaches, whereas self-assembly, thermal annealing, arc-discharge, wet chemical, and electrochemical erosion are representative post-treatment methods. The latter techniques keep the original graphene structure via more surface doping than substitutional doping. As a result, it is possible to preserve the features of the graphene while offering a straightforward handling technique that is more stable and controllable than direct techniques. This review also explains the latest progress in the prospective uses of graphene doped with phosphorous and boron for electronic devices, i.e., fuel and solar cells, supercapacitors, and batteries. Their novel energy-related applications will continue to be a promising area of study.

Indexed as

doped grapheneenergy devicesfuel cellssolar cellssynthetic strategies

Identifiers

PMID36770159
PMCPMC9919781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.