ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Process Parameter Selection for Production of Stainless Steel 316L Using Efficient Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Algorithm.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering-Where Do We Stand Today?Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Review
- Cautious Bayesian Optimization: A Line Tracker Case Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing is a modern technique to produce parts with a complex geometry. However, the choice of the printing parameters is a time-consuming and costly process. In this study, the parameter optimization for the laser powder bed fusion process was investigated. Using state-of-the art multi-objective Bayesian optimization, the set of the most-promising process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, hatch distance, etc.), which would yield parts with the desired hardness and porosity, was established. The Gaussian process surrogate model was built on 57 empirical data points, and through efficient sampling in the design space, we were able to obtain three points in the Pareto front in just over six iterations. The produced parts had a hardness ranging from 224-235 HV and a porosity in the range of 0.2-0.37%. The trained model recommended using the following parameters for high-quality parts: 58 W, 257 mm/s, 45 µm, with a scan rotation angle of 131 degrees. The proposed methodology greatly reduces the number of experiments, thus saving time and resources. The candidate process parameters prescribed by the model were experimentally validated and tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.