Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769820›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Efficacy and Treatment Satisfaction of Different Systemic Therapies in Children and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Study.

Sebastian Kiefer, Anke König, Viviane Gerger, Christine Rummenigge, Anne Christine Müller, Thomas Jung, Alexandra Frank, Georgios Tassopoulos, Emilie Laurent, Roland Kaufmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Disruptive Force of Real-World Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sebastian KieferDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Anke KönigDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Viviane GergerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christine RummeniggeDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Anne Christine MüllerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas JungDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alexandra FrankDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Georgios TassopoulosDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Emilie LaurentDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Roland KaufmannDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas PinterDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1330-1502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents, the monoclonal antibody dupilumab and the selective JAK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib are two modern systemic therapies approved for long-term treatment. Both drugs have demonstrated high efficacy in randomized controlled trials, although evidence from real-world data in the pediatric population is limited. In a prospective analysis over 24 weeks, we investigated the efficacy, safety and treatment satisfaction of both systemic therapies in 23 patients (16 patients treated with dupilumab; 7 patients treated with upadacitinib). The median age of the patients was 16 years, with a median EASI of 18.8. A significant improvement in the EASI, VAS-itch, CDLQI, POEM and DFIQ from baseline to week 24 was demonstrated for both treatment options. No significant difference was observed between dupilumab and upadacitinib in any of the assessed scores. Less adverse events were recorded in the real-world setting compared with clinical trials. Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of dupilumab and upadacitinib as equivalent treatment options in children and adolescents in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

adolescentsatopic dermatitischildrendupilumabreal-world dataupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID36769820
PMCPMC9917393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.