ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
SEMAC + VAT for Suppression of Artifacts Induced by Dental-Implant-Supported Restorations in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of CBCT and dental-MRI for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single titanium implants: an in-vitro pilot study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Intraoperative C-arm CBCT versus early postoperative MRI for the assessment of fracture reduction and osteosynthesis material positioning in cranio-maxillofacial trauma surgery.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Observational
- Impact of sequence selection on postoperative MRI interpretability and artifact reduction in simulated mandibular trauma.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Assessment of the intrasinusidal volume before and after maxillary sinus augmentation using mri - a pilot study of eight patients.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of SEMAC + VAT to reduce artifacts induced by dental implant-supported restorations, such as its impact on the image quality. Dental-implant supported restorations were installed in a dry mandible. Magnetic resonance scans were acquired on a 3-Tesla MRI system. Artifact suppression (SEMAC + VAT) was applied with different intensity modes (weak, moderate, strong). Artifacts assessment was performed by measuring the mandible volume increase in MRI images prior (reference dataset) and after installation of dental implant-supported prosthesis. Image quality was assessed by two examiners using a five-point scale. Inter-examiner concordance and correlation analysis was performed with Cronbach's alpha and Spearman's test with a significance level at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.