ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Acuity and Quality of Vision in Eyes with Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy after Regular Pseudophakia.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of corneal wavefront aberrations and corneal densitometry in eyes with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Visual Quality: The Impact of Alcohol-Assisted Delamination on Corneal Aberrations in Patients with Central Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Corneal Epithelial Wavefront Error as a Novel Diagnostic Marker for Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical features and comprehensive treatment of persistent corneal epithelial dysfunction after cataract surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective case-control study was conducted to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the visual impairment in eyes with Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy (EBMD) after regular cataract surgery.
methodsEBMD pseudophakic eyes were compared with matched pseudophakic eyes free from surface disorders. At least 3 weeks after surgery we evaluated uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), objective aberrometry, Point Spread Function (PSF), Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and patient complaints.
resultsTwenty-five EBMD eyes and 25 control eyes (13 patients per group) were included. Nine patients per group had a monofocal IOL, and four patients had a trifocal IOL. All the EBMD patients complained of postoperative blurred vision with ocular discomfort; intensive use of lubricants induced subjective improvement only in eyes with monofocal IOLs. Postoperative mean UDVA was 0.19 ± 0.16 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.11 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control group (
conclusionAfter cataract removal, eyes with EBMD had significantly lower UDVA and CDVA than controls. All the aberrometric parameters were significantly worse in EBMD cases. EBMD patients complained about their postoperative visual outcome, while control patients did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.