Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769718›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Inhaled Sedation with Volatile Anesthetics for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review.

Khaled Ahmed Yassen, Matthieu Jabaudon, Hussah Abdullah Alsultan, Haya Almousa, Dur I Shahwar, Fatimah Yousef Alhejji, Zainab Yaseen Aljaziri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khaled Ahmed YassenAnaesthesia Unit, Surgery Department, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Hofuf City 31982, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3483-0291
Matthieu JabaudonDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferand, iGReD, Universite Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, ISERM, 6300 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-1680
Hussah Abdullah AlsultanAnaesthesia Department, King Abdulaziz Hospital, P.O. Box 2477, Hofuf City 31982, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.
Haya AlmousaAnaesthesia Department, King Abdulaziz Hospital, P.O. Box 2477, Hofuf City 31982, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.
Dur I ShahwarAnaesthesia Unit, Surgery Department, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Hofuf City 31982, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6672-5811
Fatimah Yousef AlhejjiOtolaryngology Department, AlJaber Specialized ENT and Eye Hospital, P.O. Box 36367, Hofuf City 36422, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab Yaseen AljaziriFamily Medicine Department, AlAhsa Health Cluster, P.O. Box 5298, Hofuf City 36356, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-9701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled sedation was recently approved in Europe as an alternative to intravenous sedative drugs for intensive care unit (ICU) sedation. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the available data from the literature published between 2005 and 2023 in terms of the efficacy, safety, and potential clinical benefits of inhaled sedation for ICU mechanically ventilated patients. The results indicated that inhaled sedation reduces the time to extubation and weaning from mechanical ventilation and reduces opioid and muscle relaxant consumption, thereby possibly enhancing recovery. Several researchers have reported its potential cardio-protective, anti-inflammatory or bronchodilator properties, alongside its minimal metabolism by the liver and kidney. The reflection devices used with inhaled sedation may increase the instrumental dead space volume and could lead to hypercapnia if the ventilator settings are not optimal and the end tidal carbon dioxide is not monitored. The risk of air pollution can be prevented by the adequate scavenging of the expired gases. Minimizing atmospheric pollution can be achieved through the judicious use of the inhalation sedation for selected groups of ICU patients, where the benefits are maximized compared to intravenous sedation. Very rarely, inhaled sedation can induce malignant hyperthermia, which prompts urgent diagnosis and treatment by the ICU staff. Overall, there is growing evidence to support the benefits of inhaled sedation as an alternative for intravenous sedation in ICU mechanically ventilated patients. The indication and management of any side effects should be clearly set and protocolized by each ICU. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to investigate whether inhaled sedation should be prioritized over the current practice of intravenous sedation.

Indexed as

desfluraneintensive care unitisofluranemechanical ventilationsedationsevofluranevolatile anesthetics

Identifiers

PMID36769718
PMCPMC9918250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.