ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count in Cardiogenic Shock.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with asymptomatic coronary artery disease: a cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Selective C-reactive protein apheresis in acute myocardial infarction: rationale and design of a prospective international randomized controlled trial.Coronary artery disease · 2025Article
- Cardiogenic Shock Due to Progressive Heart Failure-Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Compared to Other Aetiologies.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Current and novel biomarkers in cardiogenic shock.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Observational
- Biomarkers in cardiogenic shock: old pals, new friends.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- C-reactive protein and procalcitonin during course of sepsis and septic shock.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- More Alike Than Not? Predicting Mortality in the Cardiac and Medical Intensive Care Units.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Extending the 'host response' paradigm from sepsis to cardiogenic shock: evidence, limitations and opportunities.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Age-related outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock stratified by etiology.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the prognostic impact of C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) counts in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Data regarding the prognostic impact of inflammatory biomarkers in CS are scarce. All consecutive patients with CS from 2019 to 2021 admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) were included at one institution. Laboratory measurements were retrieved from the day of admission (i.e., day 1), as well as days 2, 3, 4, and 8. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.