Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769599›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

How to Conduct International Geriatric Rehabilitation Research?

Miriam L Haaksma, Adam L Gordon, Eléonore F van Dam van Isselt, Jos M G A Schols, Irma H J Everink, Ian D Cameron, Clemens Becker, Stefan Grund, Wilco P Achterberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miriam L HaaksmaUniversity Network for the Care Sector South-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3518-9152
Adam L GordonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-9853
Eléonore F van Dam van IsseltUniversity Network for the Care Sector South-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5584-6295
Jos M G A ScholsDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4062-2061
Irma H J EverinkDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2528-6116
Ian D CameronJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District and Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Clemens BeckerDepartment of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert Bosch Hospital, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan GrundCenter for Geriatric Medicine, Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg, Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Wilco P AchterbergUniversity Network for the Care Sector South-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-7135

Funding

Leiden University Fund/Leiden Empowerment Fund LEF2106-2-47
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an ageing global population and an increasing focus on aging in place, the number of people in need of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) is rapidly increasing. As current GR practice is very heterogenous, cross-country comparisons could allow us to learn from each other and optimise the effectiveness of GR. However, international GR research comes with many challenges. This article summarises the facilitators and barriers relating to the recruitment of rehabilitation centres, the inclusion of patients, and data collection, as experienced by experts in the field of international GR research. The three most important methodological recommendations for conducting cross-national collaborative research in the field of GR are (1) make use of existing (inter)national networks and social media to aid recruitment of GR centres; (2) clearly define the GR treatment, setting, and patient characteristics in the inclusion criteria; and (3) use a hierarchical study structure to communicate transparently and regularly with both national and local coordinators. International GR research would greatly benefit from the implementation of a core dataset in regular GR care. Therefore, future studies should focus on developing an international consensus regarding the outcomes and corresponding cross-culturally validated measurement instruments to be used during GR.

Indexed as

geriatric rehabilitationmethodologystudy design

Identifiers

PMID36769599
PMCPMC9917925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.