Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769583›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Impact of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Other Gastrointestinal Disorders-A Retrospective Analysis in a Tertiary Single Center and Review of the Literature.

Julia Wanzl, Katharina Gröhl, Agnieszka Kafel, Sandra Nagl, Anna Muzalyova, Stefan Karl Gölder, Alanna Ebigbo, Helmut Messmann, Elisabeth Schnoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia WanzlInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Katharina GröhlInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Agnieszka KafelInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Sandra NaglInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Anna MuzalyovaInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4441-8006
Stefan Karl GölderInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Alanna EbigboInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Helmut MessmannInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Elisabeth SchnoyInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is often found in patients with gut dysbiosis such as irritable bowel syndrome. Recently, the association of SIBO and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been described in some cases. While clinical symptoms might be similar in IBD and SIBO, treatment is quite different for both diseases. Therefore, the differentiation between SIBO or a flare in IBD patients is key to optimizing treatment for these patients.

methodsWe retrospectively investigated our patients with IBD receiving a glucose breath test for SIBO and correlated the results with the clinical symptoms (clinical remission or active disease).

results128 patients with the diagnosis "colitis" were analyzed in our cohort. Fifty-three (41.4%) patients had Crohn's disease and 22 (17.2%) patients were suffering from ulcerative colitis. Seventy-four (57.8%) were female and 54 (42.2%) were male patients. A total of 18 (14.1%) patients had a positive testing for SIBO. Eleven (61.1%) cases were associated with CD patients and two (11.1%) with UC. IBD patients in clinical remission had a positive SIBO in six (19.4%) cases, while IBD patients with active disease were positive in nine (15.3%) cases. The proportion of positive SIBO in active IBD patients was higher; however, it did not reach significance. Older age was a risk factor for SIBO in patients with CD (

conclusionsIn our study, we could show that an increased amount of SIBO was found in IBD patients and was especially more frequent in patients with CD than in those with UC. In UC patients, SIBO rates were not different to patients with other gastrointestinal diseases investigated (e.g., infectious colitis, collagenous colitis, or irritable bowel syndrome). In active IBD, positive SIBO was detected more often numerically compared to quiescent disease; however, due to the low number of patients included, it was not significant. However, older age was a significant risk factor for SIBO in patients with CD. SIBO is of clinical relevance in the vulnerable patient cohort with IBD, and its real prevalence and impact needs to be investigated in further and larger clinical trials.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseaseinflammatory bowel diseasesmall intestinal bacterial overgrowthulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID36769583
PMCPMC9917804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.