Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769564›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Developing an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Temporal Validation Study.

Shuhe Li, Ruoxu Dou, Xiaodong Song, Ka Yin Lui, Jinghong Xu, Zilu Guo, Xiaoguang Hu, Xiangdong Guan, Changjie Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuhe LiDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Ruoxu DouDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaodong SongDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Ka Yin LuiDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jinghong XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zilu GuoDepartment of Statistics, William March Rice University, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Xiaoguang HuDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiangdong GuanDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Changjie CaiDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3120-4658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk stratification plays an essential role in the decision making for sepsis management, as existing approaches can hardly satisfy the need to assess this heterogeneous population. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis.

methodsAdult patients fulfilling the definition of Sepsis-3 were included at a large tertiary medical center. Relevant clinical features were extracted within the first 24 h in ICU, re-classified into different genres, and utilized for model development under three strategies: "Basic + Lab", "Basic + Intervention", and "Whole" feature sets. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was compared with logistic regression (LR) and established severity scores. Temporal validation was conducted using admissions from 2017 to 2019.

resultsThe final cohort included 24,272 patients, of which 4013 patients formed the test cohort for temporal validation. The trained and fine-tuned XGBoost model with the whole feature set showed the best discriminatory ability in the test cohort with AUROC as 0.85, significantly higher than the XGBoost "Basic + Lab" model (0.83), the LR "Whole" model (0.82), SOFA (0.63), SAPS-II (0.73), and LODS score (0.74). The performance in varying subgroups remained robust, and predictors, such as increased urine output and supplemental oxygen therapy, were crucially correlated with improved survival when interpretability was explored.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a novel XGBoost-based model and demonstrated significantly improved performance to LR and other scores in predicting the mortality risks of sepsis patients in the hospital using features in the first 24 h.

Indexed as

extreme gradient boostinginterpretabilitymortalitysepsistemporal validation

Identifiers

PMID36769564
PMCPMC9917524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.