Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769389›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Two-Years Follow-Up of Symptoms and Return to Work in Complex Post-COVID-19 Patients.

Erika Van Wambeke, Cécile Bezler, Anne-Marie Kasprowicz, Anne-Laure Charles, Emmanuel Andres, Bernard Geny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An open trial of biofeedback for long COVID.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of Long COVID on productivity and informal caregiving.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erika Van WambekePhysiology and Functional Exploration Service, University Hospital of Strasbourg, NHC, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, CEDEX, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
Cécile BezlerPhysiology and Functional Exploration Service, University Hospital of Strasbourg, NHC, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, CEDEX, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
Anne-Marie KasprowiczPhysiology and Functional Exploration Service, University Hospital of Strasbourg, NHC, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, CEDEX, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
Anne-Laure CharlesTeam 3072 "Mitochondria, Oxidative Stress and Muscle Protection", Translational Medicine Federation of Strasbourg (FMTS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg, 11 Rue Humann, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3557-2642
Emmanuel AndresDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, CEDEX, 67091 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7914-7616
Bernard GenyPhysiology and Functional Exploration Service, University Hospital of Strasbourg, NHC, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, CEDEX, 67091 Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany COVID-19 patients present with severe long-lasting symptoms. They might benefit from a coordination team to manage such complex situations, but late efficacy still needs to be determined. POPULATION AND

methodsOut of 105 contacts, 45 patients had two phone consultations separated by personalized support 15 and 22 months, respectively, after COVID infection. Self-reported symptoms, feelings of improvement and ability to return to work allowed us to determine the efficacy of the therapeutic strategy proposed.

resultsUnlike what was expected, many post-COVID-19 patients directly contacted the coordination team and had significant pre-existing comorbidities. Despite exercise, respiratory, olfactory rehabilitations, cognition/speech therapy and/or psychological support, the more frequent self-reported symptoms (fatigue, neurocognitive disorders, muscles and joint pain) did not resolve. However, dyspnea, anxiety and chest pain were significantly reduced. Finally, 2/3 of the patients felt some degree of improvement and returned to work either partially or fully, but 1/3 remained complaining of symptoms and out of work as late as 22 months after COVID occurrence. All patients greatly appreciated the second phone consultation.

conclusionsIn such complex situations, besides early and adapted rehabilitations and psychological help allowing better symptom management, relatively simple actions such as a phone call might be very useful to reduce patients' feelings of abandonment.

Indexed as

coordination teamemploymentlong-COVIDpost-COVID-19 conditionprolonged symptomsrehabilitationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36769389
PMCPMC9917586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.