Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

A Framework for Human Corneal Endothelial Cell Culture and Preliminary Wound Model Experiments with a New Cell Tracking Approach.

Francisco Bandeira, Gustavo Teixeira Grottone, Joyce Luciana Covre, Priscila Cardoso Cristovam, Renata Ruoco Loureiro, Francisco Irochima Pinheiro, Ricardo Pedro Casaroli-Marano, Waleska Donato, José Álvaro Pereira Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francisco BandeiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-4315
Gustavo Teixeira GrottoneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.
Joyce Luciana CovreDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.
Priscila Cardoso CristovamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.
Renata Ruoco LoureiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.
Francisco Irochima PinheiroBiotechnology Post-Graduate Program, Potiguar University, Natal 59082-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-3997
Ricardo Pedro Casaroli-MaranoMedicine School, Barcelona University, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1812-9323
Waleska DonatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.
José Álvaro Pereira GomesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell injection therapy is emerging as an alternative to treat corneal endothelial dysfunction (CED) and to avoid corneal scarring due to bullous keratopathy. However, establishing a standardized culture procedure that provides appropriate cell yield while retaining functional features remains a challenge. Here, we describe a detailed framework obtained from in vitro culture of human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) and comparative in vivo experimental models for CED treatment with a new cell tracking approach. Two digestion methods were compared regarding HCEC morphology and adhesion. The effect of Y-27632 (ROCKi) supplementation on final cell yield was also assessed. Cell adhesion efficacy with two cell delivery systems (superparamagnetic embedding and cell suspension) was evaluated in an ex vivo human cornea model and in an in vivo rabbit CED model. The injection of supplemented culture medium or balanced salt solution (BSS) was used for the positive and negative controls, respectively. HCEC isolation with collagenase resulted in better morphology and adhesion of cultured HCEC when compared to EDTA. Y-27632 supplementation resulted in a 2.6-fold increase in final cell yield compared to the control. Ex vivo and in vivo adhesion with both cell delivery systems was confirmed by cell tracker fluorescence detection. Corneal edema and opacity improved in both animal groups treated with cultured HCEC. The corneas in the control groups remained opaque. Both HCEC delivery systems seemed comparable as treatments for CED and for the prevention of corneal scarring.

Indexed as

Cell TrackingEndothelium, CornealAmidesAnimalsCells, CulturedCicatrixEndothelial CellsHumansPyridinesRabbitsAmidesPyridinesY 27632cell therapycorneal transplanthuman corneal endothelial cells

Identifiers

PMID36769303
PMCPMC9917640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.