Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769057›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Transient Changes in the Plasma of Astrocytic and Neuronal Injury Biomarkers in COVID-19 Patients without Neurological Syndromes.

Matthew P Lennol, Nicholas J Ashton, Oscar Moreno-Pérez, María-Salud García-Ayllón, Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon, Mariano Andrés, José-Manuel León-Ramírez, Vicente Boix, Joan Gil, Kaj Blennow and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Human brain matters: Navigating the neuropathology of COVID-19.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Lung endothelial cytopathic tau is sufficient to impair long-term potentiation during infection.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matthew P LennolInstituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Oscar Moreno-PérezDepartmento de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
María-Salud García-AyllónInstituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5140-9752
Jose-Manuel Ramos-RinconInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), General University Hospital of Alicantet, 03010 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-9867
Mariano AndrésInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), General University Hospital of Alicantet, 03010 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-9055
José-Manuel León-RamírezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), General University Hospital of Alicantet, 03010 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7922-5664
Vicente BoixInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), General University Hospital of Alicantet, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Joan GilInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), General University Hospital of Alicantet, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Esperanza MerinoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), General University Hospital of Alicantet, 03010 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3854-4874
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden.
Javier Sáez-ValeroInstituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7480-320X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The levels of several glial and neuronal plasma biomarkers have been found to increase during the acute phase in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. However, replications in patients with minor or non-neurological symptoms are needed to understand their potential as indicators of CNS injury or vulnerability. Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain protein (NfL), and total Tau (T-tau) were determined by Single molecule array (Simoa) immunoassays in 45 samples from COVID-19 patients in the acute phase of infection [moderate (n = 35), or severe (n = 10)] with minor or non-neurological symptoms; in 26 samples from fully recovered patients after ~2 months of clinical follow-up [moderate (n = 23), or severe (n = 3)]; and in 14 non-infected controls. Plasma levels of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), were also determined by Western blot. Patients with COVID-19 without substantial neurological symptoms had significantly higher plasma concentrations of GFAP, a marker of astrocytic activation/injury, and of NfL and T-tau, markers of axonal damage and neuronal degeneration, compared with controls. All these biomarkers were correlated in COVID-19 patients at the acute phase. Plasma GFAP, NfL and T-tau levels were all normalized after recovery. Recovery was also observed in the return to normal values of the quotient between the ACE2 fragment and circulating full-length species, following the change noticed in the acute phase of infection. None of these biomarkers displayed differences in plasma samples at the acute phase or recovery when the COVID-19 subjects were sub-grouped according to occurrence of minor symptoms at re-evaluation 3 months after the acute episode (so called post-COVID or "long COVID"), such as asthenia, myalgia/arthralgia, anosmia/ageusia, vision impairment, headache or memory loss. Our study demonstrated altered plasma GFAP, NfL and T-tau levels in COVID-19 patients without substantial neurological manifestation at the acute phase of the disease, providing a suitable indication of CNS vulnerability; but these biomarkers fail to predict the occurrence of delayed minor neurological symptoms.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2COVID-19BiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansNeurofilament ProteinsNeuronsSARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2BiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNeurofilament ProteinsbiomarkerCOVID-19GFAPNfLplasmaT-tau

Identifiers

PMID36769057
PMCPMC9917569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.