Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769043›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Natural Inhibitors of Cholinesterases: Chemistry, Structure-Activity and Methods of Their Analysis.

Natalia Smyrska-Wieleba, Tomasz Mroczek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Significance of Astragaloside IV from the Roots ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia Smyrska-WielebaDepartment of Chemistry of Natural Products, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chodzki Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz MroczekDepartment of Chemistry of Natural Products, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chodzki Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5267-7182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to provide an updated description and comparison of the data currently available in the literature (from the last 15 years) on the studied natural inhibitors of cholinesterases (IChEs), namely, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). These data also apply to the likely impact of the structures of the compounds on the therapeutic effects of available and potential cholinesterase inhibitors. IChEs are hitherto known compounds with various structures, activities and origins. Additionally, multiple different methods of analysis are used to determine the cholinesterase inhibitor potency. This summary indicates that natural sources are still suitable for the discovery of new compounds with prominent pharmacological activity. It also emphasizes that further studies are needed regarding the mechanisms of action or the structure-activity correlation to discuss the issue of cholinesterase inhibitors and their medical application.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseButyrylcholinesteraseAcetylcholinesteraseCholinesterase InhibitorsHumansKineticsStructure-Activity RelationshipAcetylcholinesteraseButyrylcholinesteraseCholinesterase Inhibitorsacetylcholinesterase inhibitorsAlzheimer’s diseasebutyrylcholinesterase inhibitorscentral nervous systemnatural products

Identifiers

PMID36769043
PMCPMC9916849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.