Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36769032›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Experimental Models of In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier for CNS Drug Delivery: An Evolutionary Perspective.

Bivek Chaulagain, Avinash Gothwal, Richard Nii Lante Lamptey, Riddhi Trivedi, Arun Kumar Mahanta, Buddhadev Layek, Jagdish Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. PET imaging of alpha-synuclein: from radiotracer design through in vitro and in vivo translation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. BBB-Permeable PROTACs: Where Do We Stand?ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bivek ChaulagainDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
Avinash GothwalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
Richard Nii Lante LampteyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-9083
Riddhi TrivediDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
Arun Kumar MahantaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
Buddhadev LayekDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2457-7619
Jagdish SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.

Funding

Targeting CLEC-2/podoplanin as a therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancerP20GM109024 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Sanku Mallik · 2016 to 2026
$20.5M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM128729 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI BASSON, MARC D. · 2018 to 2022
$20.3M
Brain Neurotropic Growth Factor Delivery to Prevent and Treat Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG051574 · NIA · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANEKIYO, TAKAHISA, SINGH, JAGDISH · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Enhanced APOE2 Expression into Brain for Therapeutic Strategy for Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG068034 · NIA · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANEKIYO, TAKAHISA, SINGH, JAGDISH · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
Enhanced APOE2 Expression into Brain for Therapeutic Strategy for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG068034 · NIA · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANEKIYO, TAKAHISA, SINGH, JAGDISH · 2024 to 2025
$1.0M
DaCCoTA CTR pilot ready-to-go grant U54GM128729National Institute of Health RO1 AG051574, RF1 AG068034, and AG068034-0LS1NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051574NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068034NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG068034NIGMS NIH HHS 2P20 GM109024NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109024NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM128729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) disorders represent one of the leading causes of global health burden. Nonetheless, new therapies approved against these disorders are among the lowest compared to their counterparts. The absence of reliable and efficient in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) models resembling in vivo barrier properties stands out as a significant roadblock in developing successful therapy for CNS disorders. Therefore, advancement in the creation of robust and sensitive in vitro BBB models for drug screening might allow us to expedite neurological drug development. This review discusses the major in vitro BBB models developed as of now for exploring the barrier properties of the cerebral vasculature. Our main focus is describing existing in vitro models, including the 2D transwell models covering both single-layer and co-culture models, 3D organoid models, and microfluidic models with their construction, permeability measurement, applications, and limitations. Although microfluidic models are better at recapitulating the in vivo properties of BBB than other models, significant gaps still exist for their use in predicting the performance of neurotherapeutics. However, this comprehensive account of in vitro BBB models can be useful for researchers to create improved models in the future.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System DiseasesBiological TransportCentral Nervous System AgentsHumansMicrofluidicsModels, BiologicalCentral Nervous System Agentsblood–brain barrier (BBB)endothelial cells (ECs)in vitro modelsmicrofluidicsneurotherapeuticstranswell model

Identifiers

PMID36769032
PMCPMC9916529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.