ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Targeting the Brain with Single-Domain Antibodies: Greater Potential Than Stated So Far?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Understanding Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Iran: a systematic review of case reports.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological modulation of cGAS-STING-NLRP3 signaling by nano-immunomodulators in Alzheimer and Parkinson disease.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Divergent Roles of mGlu2 and mGlu3 Receptors in Amyloid-β Production and Cognitive Dysfunctions in Alzheimer's Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Targeting mGlyR with nanobodies for depression.Nature communications · 2026Article
- An engineered nanobody inhibitor for molecular-to-circuit control of opioid receptor function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Antibody-conjugated polymer nanoparticles for brain cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
- Beyond amyloid: nanobody-mediated neuroinflammatory therapy for Alzheimer's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- Article
- Isolation and Characterization of the First Antigen-Specific EGFRvIII vNAR from Freshwater Stingray (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biosafety and immunology: An interdisciplinary field for health priority.Biosafety and health · 2024Review
- Recombinant Antibody Fragments for Immunotherapy of Parkinson's Disease.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024Review
- Recombinant Antibody Fragments for Neurological Disorders: An Update.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatments for central nervous system diseases with therapeutic antibodies have been increasingly investigated over the last decades, leading to some approved monoclonal antibodies for brain disease therapies. The detection of biomarkers for diagnosis purposes with non-invasive antibody-based imaging approaches has also been explored in brain cancers. However, antibodies generally display a low capability of reaching the brain, as they do not efficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. As an alternative, recent studies have focused on single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) that correspond to the antigen-binding fragment. While some reports indicate that the brain uptake of these small antibodies is still low, the number of studies reporting brain-penetrating sdAbs is increasing. In this review, we provide an overview of methods used to assess or evaluate brain penetration of sdAbs and discuss the pros and cons that could affect the identification of brain-penetrating sdAbs of therapeutic or diagnostic interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.