Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768759›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Fluorescence Imaging of Cell Membrane Potential: From Relative Changes to Absolute Values.

Dmitrii M Nikolaev, Vladimir N Mironov, Andrey A Shtyrov, Iaroslav D Kvashnin, Andrey S Mereshchenko, Andrey V Vasin, Maxim S Panov, Mikhail N Ryazantsev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Absolute voltage mapping using dynamic photocycle control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fluorescence of the Retinal Chromophore in Microbial and Animal Rhodopsins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dmitrii M NikolaevInstitute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnologies, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya str., 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-9490
Vladimir N MironovNanotechnology Research and Education Centre RAS, Saint Petersburg Academic University, 8/3 Khlopina str., 194021 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey A ShtyrovInstitute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnologies, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya str., 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Iaroslav D KvashninNanotechnology Research and Education Centre RAS, Saint Petersburg Academic University, 8/3 Khlopina str., 194021 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey S MereshchenkoInstitute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 26 Universitetskii pr, 198504 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9390-1446
Andrey V VasinInstitute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnologies, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya str., 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-7139
Maxim S PanovInstitute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 26 Universitetskii pr, 198504 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6817-407X
Mikhail N RyazantsevNanotechnology Research and Education Centre RAS, Saint Petersburg Academic University, 8/3 Khlopina str., 194021 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3413-1706

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education 075-15-2021-1333Russian Science Foundation 20-13-00303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane potential is a fundamental property of biological cells. Changes in membrane potential characterize a vast number of vital biological processes, such as the activity of neurons and cardiomyocytes, tumorogenesis, cell-cycle progression, etc. A common strategy to record membrane potential changes that occur in the process of interest is to utilize organic dyes or genetically-encoded voltage indicators with voltage-dependent fluorescence. Sensors are introduced into target cells, and alterations of fluorescence intensity are recorded with optical methods. Techniques that allow recording relative changes of membrane potential and do not take into account fluorescence alterations due to factors other than membrane voltage are already widely used in modern biological and biomedical studies. Such techniques have been reviewed previously in many works. However, in order to investigate a number of processes, especially long-term processes, the measured signal must be corrected to exclude the contribution from voltage-independent factors or even absolute values of cell membrane potential have to be evaluated. Techniques that enable such measurements are the subject of this review.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesNeuronsCell MembraneMembrane PotentialsOptical ImagingFluorescent Dyescell membrane potentialgenetically-encoded voltage indicatorsmembrane potential imagingpotentiometric sensorsvoltage-sensitive dyes

Identifiers

PMID36768759
PMCPMC9916766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.