ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Comparative Analysis of Library Preparation Approaches for SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq Platform.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicological and Functional Assessment of Minicell-Encapsulated dsRNA on Biocontrol Agents in Agriculture.ACS environmental Au · 2025Article
- Development of a direct whole genome sequencing for hepatitis A virus from serum and analysis of genetic characteristics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been responsible for over two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and a global health emergency. Genomic surveillance plays a key role in overcoming the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic despite its relative successive waves and the continuous emergence of new variants. Many technological approaches are currently applied for the whole genome sequencing (WGS) of SARS-CoV-2. They differ in key stages of the process, and they feature some differences in genomic coverage, sequencing depth, and in the accuracy of variant-calling options. In this study, three different protocols for SARS-CoV-2 WGS library construction are compared: an amplicon-based protocol with a commercial primer panel; an amplicon-based protocol with a custom panel; and a hybridization capture protocol. Specific differences in sequencing depth and genomic coverage as well as differences in SNP number were found. The custom panel showed suitable results and a predictable output applicable for the epidemiological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.