Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768562›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Comparative Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors for Treatment-Naïve ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Koichi Ando, Ryo Manabe, Yasunari Kishino, Sojiro Kusumoto, Toshimitsu Yamaoka, Akihiko Tanaka, Tohru Ohmori, Hironori Sagara

Abstract readComparative StudyReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Retrospective study of alectinib treatment among variants ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Crizotinib in Patients WithJTO clinical and research reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Koichi AndoDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6535-8279
Ryo ManabeDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Yasunari KishinoDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Sojiro KusumotoDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Toshimitsu YamaokaDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-6047
Akihiko TanakaDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Tohru OhmoriDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Hironori SagaraDivision of Respirology and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2376-1606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases and acquired resistance complicate the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, this review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of brain metastasis, acquired resistance, and prospects for overcoming these challenges. A network meta-analysis of relevant phase III randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacies of multiple ALK inhibitors by drug and generation in overall patients with ALK-p untreated advanced NSCLC and a subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Generation-specific comparison results showed that third-generation ALK inhibitors were significantly more effective than second-generation ALK inhibitors in prolonging the PFS of the subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. Drug-specific comparison results demonstrated that lorlatinib was the most effective in prolonging PFS, followed by brigatinib, alectinib, ensartinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy. While lorlatinib was superior to brigatinib for PFS in the overall patient population, no significant difference between the two was found in the subgroup of patients with CNS metastases. These results can serve as a foundation for basic, clinical, and translational research and guide clinical oncologists in developing individualized treatment strategies for patients with ALK-p, ALK inhibitor-naive advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsAminopyridinesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCentral Nervous SystemHumansLactamsLactams, MacrocyclicOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesAminopyridinesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinasebrigatinibLactamsLactams, MacrocycliclorlatinibOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesPyrimidinesacquired resistanceALK rearrangementbrain metastasisnetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36768562
PMCPMC9917367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.