ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated Cell-Death Program Defines Aggressive Prostate Cancer by Coupling Ezrin to the Hippo-YAP/TAZ Axis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Olfactory Science and Technology in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Invertebrate Models to Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Integrative Whole-Genome and Epigenome Profiling of cfDNA in Familial Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- From prostate specific antigen to genomic signatures: Advances in biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- IL27 expression and IL27RA-dependent cellular responses are associated with biochemical recurrence and immune-regulatory features in prostate cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a clinical nomogram based on lasso-logistic regression for predicting prostate cancer with PSA 4-20.0 ng/mL: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Review
- Prostate cancer misdiagnosed as prostatic abscess: case report and literature review.BMC urology · 2025Review
- Blood and urine-based biomarkers in prostate cancer: Current advances, clinical applications, and future directions.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- METCAM/MUC18 is a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Prostate Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Shining the Path of Precision Diagnostic: Advancements in Photonic Sensors for Liquid Biopsy.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Roadblocks of Urinary EV Biomarkers: Moving Toward the Clinic.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Review
- Advance in prostate cancer biomarker discovery: bridging detection, prognosis and therapeutics.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Role of circulating MicroRNAs in prostate cancer diagnosis and risk stratification in the MCC Spain study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Sideroflexin family genes were dysregulated and associated with tumor progression in prostate cancers.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Clinical and mechanistic insights into biomedical application of Se-enriched probiotics and biogenic selenium nanoparticles.Biotechnology letters · 2025Review
- Review
- Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapies in cancer patients.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States, prostate cancer (CaP) remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. CaP is predominantly indolent at diagnosis, with a small fraction (25-30%) representing an aggressive subtype (Gleason score 7-10) that is prone to metastatic progression. This fact, coupled with the criticism surrounding the role of prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer screening, demonstrates the current need for a biomarker(s) that can identify clinically significant CaP and avoid unnecessary biopsy procedures and psychological implications of being diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Although several diagnostic biomarkers are available to clinicians, very few comparative trials have been performed to assess the clinical effectiveness of these biomarkers. It is of note, however, that a majority of these clinical trials have been over-represented by men of Caucasian origin, despite the fact that African American men have a 1.7 times higher incidence and 2.1 times higher rate of mortality from prostate cancer. Biomarkers for CaP diagnosis based on the tissue of origin include urine-based gene expression assays (PCA3, Select MDx, ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore, Mi-Prostate Score, PCA3-PCGEM1 gene panel), blood-based protein biomarkers (4K, PHI), and tissue-based DNA biomarker (Confirm MDx). Another potential direction that has emerged to aid in the CaP diagnosis include multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), which in conjunction with clinically validated biomarkers may provide a better approach to predict clinically significant CaP at diagnosis. In this review, we discuss some of the adjunctive biomarker tests along with newer imaging modalities that are currently available to help clinicians decide which patients are at risk of having high-grade CaP on prostate biopsy with the emphasis on clinical utility of the tests across African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.