Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768173›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Targeting Gut Microbiota in Cancer Cachexia: Towards New Treatment Options.

Concetta Panebianco, Annacandida Villani, Adele Potenza, Enrica Favaro, Concetta Finocchiaro, Francesco Perri, Valerio Pazienza

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07653698 (Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07653698 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETSRan2026 to 2028Enrolled140ConditionsBreast Cancer, Cancer CachexiaArmsProbiotic Mixture, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Physical Activity, Exerkines, and Their Role in Cancer Cachexia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Concetta PanebiancoDivision of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Annacandida VillaniDivision of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Adele PotenzaDietetic and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Enrica FavaroDepartment of Medical Science, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Concetta FinocchiaroDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Francesco PerriDivision of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8314-8016
Valerio PazienzaDivision of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3492-1153

Funding

Italian Association for Cancer Research IG 2019 - ID. 23006 project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cachexia is a complex multifactorial syndrome whose hallmarks are weight loss due to the wasting of muscle tissue with or without the loss of adipose tissue, anorexia, systemic inflammation, and multi-organ metabolic alterations, which negatively impact patients' response to anticancer treatments, quality of life, and overall survival. Despite its clinical relevance, cancer cachexia often remains an underestimated complication due to the lack of rigorous diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. A number of studies have shown alterations in gut microbiota diversity and composition in association with cancer cachexia markers and symptoms, thus supporting a central role for dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of this syndrome. Different tools of microbiota manipulation, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, have been investigated, demonstrating encouraging improvements in cachexia outcomes. Albeit pioneering, these studies pave the way for future research with the aim of exploring the role of gut microbiota in cancer cachexia more deeply and setting up effective microbiota-targeting interventions to be translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeNeoplasmsProbioticsCachexiaDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansPrebioticsQuality of LifePrebioticscancer cachexiagut microbiotamicrobiota manipulation strategies

Identifiers

PMID36768173
PMCPMC9916111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.