Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768083›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Nurse and Patient Assessments of COVID-19 Care Quality in China: A Comparative Survey Study.

Wenjing Jiang, Jia Jiang, Xing'e Zhao, Zina Liu, Maritta A Valimaki, Xianhong Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjing JiangDepartment of Nursing, Zigong First People's Hospital, Zigong 643000, China.
Jia JiangWest China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xing'e ZhaoDepartment of Liver Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Zina LiuXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Maritta A ValimakiXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Xianhong LiXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Central South University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of nursing care was a concern due to nurses' overwhelming workload. A cross-sectional design was conducted to compare perceptions between nurses and patients about the quality of nursing care for COVID-19 patients and to explore factors associated with these perceptions. Data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic from 17 March to 13 April 2020 in five hospitals in Wuhan, China. Perceptions of care quality were assessed among nurses and patients using the Caring Behaviors Inventory. Nurses rated the quality of caring behaviors higher than patients. Both nurses and patients rated technical caring behaviors at high levels and rated the item related to "spending time with the patient" the lowest, while patients rated it much lower than nurses. Nurses' sex, participation in ethical training organized by the hospital, professional title, being invited to Wuhan, and length of working experience in years were significantly associated with nurses' self-evaluated caring behaviors. Moreover, inpatient setting and communication mode were significantly associated with patients' self-evaluated caring behaviors.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesNursing Staff, HospitalChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInpatientsPandemicsQuality of Health CareSurveys and Questionnairescaring behaviorcomparisonCOVID-19nursespatientsquality of care

Identifiers

PMID36768083
PMCPMC9915960
OpenAlexW4319159218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.