Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768072›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Current Situations and Challenges in the Development of Health Information Literacy.

Qiulin Wang, Chunhua Tao, Yuan Yuan, Song Zhang, Jingyan Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiulin WangCollege of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Chunhua TaoSchool of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Yuan YuanSchool of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1074-8667
Song ZhangSchool of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9583-3926
Jingyan LiangSchool of Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9674-0235

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health information literacy (HIL) is a significant concept that has gradually become known to the broader public in recent years. Although the definitions of HIL and health literacy seem to overlap, as an independent subconcept, HIL still shows a unique influence on improvements in people's health and health education. Remarkable evidence indicates that online health information (OHI) can effectively enrich people's knowledge and encourage patients to actively join the medical process, which is also accompanied by the emergence of various assessment tools. Although the current assessment tools, to a certain extent, can help people identify their shortcomings and improve their HIL, many studies have indicated that the deficiencies of the scales induce incomplete or unreal results of their HIL. In addition, continuing research has revealed an increasing number of influencing factors that have great effects on HIL and even regulate the different trends in doctor-patient relationships. Simultaneously, most of the uncensored OHI broadcasts have also affected the improvement in HIL in various ways. Thus, this review aims to summarize the assessment tools, influencing factors and current situations and challenges related to HIL. Further studies are required to provide more trusted and deeper references for the development of HIL.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHealth EducationHumansKnowledgePhysician-Patient RelationsTrustassessment toolsdoctor–patient relationshiphealth information literacyhealth information sourcesinfluencing factors

Identifiers

PMID36768072
PMCPMC9915875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.