Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768065›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Comparing Fourteen Weeks of Multicomponent Training Versus Combined Training in Physically Inactive Older Women: A Randomized Trial.

Guilherme da Silva Rodrigues, Karine Pereira Rodrigues, Mariana Luciano de Almeida, Andressa Crystine da Silva Sobrinho, Natalia Yumi Noronha, Cicero Jonas Rodrigues Benjamim, Sabrina da Silva, Jhennyfer Aline Lima Rodrigues, Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guilherme da Silva RodriguesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-4709
Karine Pereira RodriguesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-1897
Mariana Luciano de AlmeidaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9690-0163
Andressa Crystine da Silva SobrinhoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4532-539X
Natalia Yumi NoronhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.
Cicero Jonas Rodrigues BenjamimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8679-7166
Sabrina da SilvaSchool of Physical Education of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.
Jhennyfer Aline Lima RodriguesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Roberto Bueno JúniorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-907, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined (CT) and multicomponent training (MT) presents several benefits for aging individuals. However, the literature does not provide evidence on which of the two physical training models can better enhance improvements in physical capacity and health parameters in middle-aged and older women.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of MT and CT on physical capacity, cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial assessment, and biochemical profile of physically inactive women aged between 50 and 70 years.

methodsParticipants were randomized into two groups: MT (32 women, 64.2 ± 6.4 years) and CT (39 women, 61.4 ± 4.3 years). Both training sessions had a weekly volume of 180 min, for 14 weeks, with assessments at baseline and after the training period.

resultsCT showed better results when compared to MT. In the four evaluation blocks, we noticed differences in the effect size (L = large, M = moderate, S = small, and T = trivial) between the groups in 26 variables in total, highlighting the CT group (L = 11, M = 5, S = 2, and T = 8) compared to the MT group (L = 8, M = 7, S = 7, and T = 4). Our findings showed group-time differences for strength variables using the maximum dynamic repetition test in upper and lower limbs and for agility. The multicomponent training showed improvement in the functional strength of the upper limbs evaluated through the elbow flexion and extension test (

conclusionsFourteen weeks of CT showed better benefits when compared to MT.

Indexed as

Elbow JointResistance TrainingAgedAgingExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthRange of Motion, Articularagingexercise trainingphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID36768065
PMCPMC9916113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.