Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36768048›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Implementing a Community-Led Arsenic Mitigation Intervention for Private Well Users in American Indian Communities: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Strong Heart Water Study Program.

Darcy M Anderson, Annabelle Black Bear, Tracy Zacher, Kelly Endres, Ronald Saxton, Francine Richards, Lisa Bear Robe, David Harvey, Lyle G Best, Reno Red Cloud and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Intersectionality and Social Drivers of Health in Cardiovascular Care.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Darcy M AndersonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Annabelle Black BearMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Tracy ZacherMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Kelly EndresDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-298X
Ronald SaxtonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Francine RichardsMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Lisa Bear RobeMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
David HarveyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Lyle G BestMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Reno Red CloudEnvironmental Resource Department, Oglala Sioux Tribe, Pine Ridge, SD 57770, USA.
Elizabeth D ThomasDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Joel GittelsohnDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2761-3280
Marcia O'LearyMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Ana Navas-AcienDepartment of Environmental Health Science, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-7797
Christine Marie GeorgeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USMissouri Breaks Industries Research (United States) · USColumbia University · USOglala Sioux Tribal Council · US

Funding

Research Experience and Training Coordination CoreP42ES033719 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ana Navas-Acien · 2022 to 2026
$11.9M
Participatory Interventions to Reduce Arsenic in American Indian CommunitiesR01ES025135 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, CHRISTINE MARIE, NAVAS-ACIEN, ANA · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES033719NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arsenic is a naturally occurring toxicant in groundwater, which increases cancer and cardiovascular disease risk. American Indian populations are disproportionately exposed to arsenic in drinking water. The Strong Heart Water Study (SHWS), through a community-centered approach for intervention development and implementation, delivered an arsenic mitigation program for private well users in American Indian communities. The SHWS program comprised community-led water arsenic testing, point-of-use arsenic filter installation, and a mobile health program to promote sustained filter use and maintenance (i.e., changing the filter cartridge). Half of enrolled households received additional in-person behavior change communication and videos. Our objectives for this study were to assess successes, barriers, and facilitators in the implementation, use, and maintenance of the program among implementers and recipients. We conducted 45 semi-structured interviews with implementers and SHWS program recipients. We analyzed barriers and facilitators using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Risks, Attitudes, Norms, Abilities, and Self-regulation model. At the implementer level, facilitators included building rapport and trust between implementers and participating households. Barriers included the remoteness of households, coordinating with community plumbers for arsenic filter installation, and difficulty securing a local supplier for replacement filter cartridges. At the recipient level, facilitators included knowledge of the arsenic health risks, perceived effectiveness of the filter, and visual cues to promote habit formation. Barriers included attitudes towards water taste and temperature and inability to procure or install replacement filter cartridges. This study offers insights into the successes and challenges of implementing an arsenic mitigation program tailored to American Indian households, which can inform future programs in partnership with these and potentially similar affected communities. Our study suggests that building credibility and trust between implementers and participants is important for the success of arsenic mitigation programs.

Indexed as

ArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeHumansQualitative ResearchWater WellsArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalarsenicconsolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)drinking waterprocess evaluationRANAS model

Identifiers

PMID36768048
PMCPMC9915175
OpenAlexW4319001028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.