Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767933›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Investigation of the Wind-Direction Effect on Buoyancy-Driven Fire Smoke Dispersion in an Urban Street Canyon.

Kaihua Lu, Yanqing Xiang, Songyang Yu, Jie Wang, Shaohua Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaihua LuFaculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences Wuhan, Lumo Road 388, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-3574
Yanqing XiangFaculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences Wuhan, Lumo Road 388, Wuhan 430074, China.
Songyang YuChina Ship Development and Design Centre, Wuhan 430064, China.
Jie WangSchool of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Heping Avenue 947, Wuhan 430081, China.
Shaohua MaoFaculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences Wuhan, Lumo Road 388, Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a fire occurs in a street canyon, smoke recirculation is the most harmful factor to human beings inside the canyon, while the wind condition is an essential factor determining if the smoke is recirculated. This paper focuses on the wind direction's effect on buoyancy-driven fire smoke dispersion in a street canyon, which is innovative research since the effect of wind direction has not been reported before. In this study, an ideal street canyon model with a height-width ratio of 1 was established, and both the wind velocity and wind direction were changed to search for the critical point at which smoke recirculation occurs. The results show that with an increase in the wind direction angle (the angle of wind towards the direction of the street width), the smoke recirculation could be distinguished into three regimes, i.e., the "fully re-circulation stage", the "semi re-circulation stage", and the "non-recirculation stage". The critical recirculation velocity was increased with the increase in the wind direction angle, and new models regarding the critical wind velocity and the Froude number were proposed for different wind direction conditions.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsFiresCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansModels, TheoreticalSmokeVehicle EmissionsWindAir PollutantsSmokeVehicle Emissionscritical recirculation velocityFroude numbersmoke dispersionurban street canyonwind direction

Identifiers

PMID36767933
PMCPMC9916227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.