Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767759›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Primary Nursing Care Model and Inpatients' Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Studies.

Isabel Gonçalves, Diana Arvelos Mendes, Sílvia Caldeira, Élvio Jesus, Elisabete Nunes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07687251 (Primary Nursing), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07687251 nacompletednot on this map

Primary Nursing: Uno Studio Pre e Post - Studio PRIMARY

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo AvogadroRan2019 to 2025Enrolled1,708ConditionsAccidental Falls, Cross Infection (Hospital-Acquired Infections), Acute Care UnitArmsPrimary Nursing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel GonçalvesUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Institute of Health Sciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Palma de Cima, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-690X
Diana Arvelos MendesInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, NURSE'IN-UIESI, Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal.
Sílvia CaldeiraUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Institute of Health Sciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Palma de Cima, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9804-2297
Élvio JesusUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Institute of Health Sciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Palma de Cima, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal.
Elisabete NunesEscola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7598-0670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe delivery of quality, safe, and patient-centered care is foundational for professional practice. The primary nursing model allows nurses to have excellent knowledge about patients and families and to plan and coordinate care from admission to discharge, with better management of health situations. Nurses play a crucial role in improving patients' outcomes, namely those sensitive to nursing care. The knowledge of the relationship between the primary nursing model and the nursing-sensitive outcomes provides new scientific evidence that strengthens the relevance of this nursing care organization model in the inpatients' health outcomes. This systematic review describes the relationship between nurse-sensitive inpatients' outcomes and the primary nursing care model.

methodsA systematic review was conducted with a narrative synthesis, and the following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, SciELO Collections, and Cochrane.

resultsA total of 22 full texts were assessed, of which five were included in the study according to the selection criteria. The analysis results indicated that the primary nursing care model was related to nursing-sensitive patient safety outcomes. Patients' experience was also considered a nursing-sensitive outcome, namely in the satisfaction with nursing care.

conclusionThe negative outcomes are clearly related to the primary nursing care model. There is scarce research that relates primary nursing to positive outcomes, such as patients' functional status and self-care abilities, and more studies are needed.

Indexed as

Primary NursingHospitalizationHumansInpatientsNarrationPatient-Centered Careinpatientsnursing-sensitive outcomespatients’ experiencepatients’ satisfactionprimary nursing

Identifiers

PMID36767759
PMCPMC9915435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.