ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
Measured Air Flow Leakage in Facemask Usage.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-Time Detection of Industrial Respirator Fit Using Embedded Breath Sensors and Machine Learning Algorithms.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Comparison of the inward leakage rate between N95 filtering facepiece respirators and modified surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of wearing a facemask during a pandemic has been widely discussed, and a number of studies have been undertaken to provide evidence of a reduced infectious virus dose because of wearing facemasks. Here, one aspect that has received little attention is the fraction of breathing flow that is not filtered because it passes as leak flow between the mask and face. Its reduction would be beneficial in reducing the dose response. The results of the present study include the filter material pressure loss parameters, pressure distributions under masks, and the fraction of breathing flow leaked versus steady breathing flow in the range of 5 to 30 L min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.