Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767624›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Body Image Assessment Tools in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.

Eduardo Borba Salzer, Juliana Fernandes Filgueiras Meireles, Alesandra Freitas Ângelo Toledo, Marcela Rodrigues de Siqueira, Maria Elisa Caputo Ferreira, Clara Mockdece Neves

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Role of Social Media Usage in the Impact of Body Image on Disordered Eating Attitudes During the Third Trimester of Pregnancy.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduardo Borba SalzerFaculdade de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.
Juliana Fernandes Filgueiras MeirelesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Community Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK 74120, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-6449
Alesandra Freitas Ângelo ToledoFaculdade de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.
Marcela Rodrigues de SiqueiraFaculdade de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.
Maria Elisa Caputo FerreiraFaculdade de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.
Clara Mockdece NevesFaculdade de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy is a remarkable time and generates several changes in women in a short period. Body image is understood as the mental representation of the body itself, and, although bodily changes are considered healthy, they can impact pregnant women's body image. Problems related to body image during pregnancy can affect the health of the mother and fetus; thus, it is essential for health professionals to detect potential disorders as soon as possible. The objective of this systematic review was to identify instruments for assessing body image in pregnant women, highlighting their main characteristics. To this end, we applied the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses to searches in the EMBASE, PubMed, and American Psychological Association databases from 5 January to 10 August 2021. We included studies on adult pregnant women without comorbidities in the validation and adaptation of (sub)scales that analyze components of body image. We excluded studies that considered nonpregnant, adolescent, postpartum, and/or clinical populations, as well as smoking/drug use studies that were not validation studies or did not assess any aspect of body image. We investigated the quality of the studies using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. In all, we examined 13 studies. The results point to a growing concern over body image during pregnancy, as there has been an increase in the number of validation and adaptation studies involving scales for different cultures that scrutinize different constructs. The findings suggest that the listed instruments be used in future research.

Indexed as

Body ImagePregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMothersPostpartum PeriodPregnancybody imagepregnancypsychometricsvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID36767624
PMCPMC9915266
OpenAlexW4318475682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.