Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767608›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Acceptability of School Menus: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods.

Síntia Almeida Santana, Sueny Andrade Batista, Dayanne da Costa Maynard, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Renata Puppin Zandonadi, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Síntia Almeida SantanaDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Sueny Andrade BatistaDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Dayanne da Costa MaynardDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9295-3006
Verônica Cortez GinaniDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-3671
Renata Puppin ZandonadiDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
Raquel Braz Assunção BotelhoDepartment of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-287X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The school meal promotes healthy eating habits through nutritionally adequate preparations. Consequently, it prevents obesity and malnutrition, favoring learning. This systematic review aimed at investigating the methods for evaluating the acceptance of school menus offered by school feeding programs (SFPs) around the world. Specific search strategies were conducted on PubMed, Lilacs, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Global. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Meta-Analysis Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument. A total of 89 studies were included. The countries with the highest number of studies were Brazil (

Indexed as

ObesitySchoolsFeeding BehaviorFoodHumansStudentsacceptabilityfood consumptionschool feedingstudents

Identifiers

PMID36767608
PMCPMC9914958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.