Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767601›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

"Compassionate City" in Patients with Advanced Illnesses and at the End of Life: A Pilot Study.

Silvia Librada-Flores, María Jesús Pérez-Solano Vázquez, Miguel Ángel Lucas-Díaz, Zacarías Rodríguez Álvarez-Ossorio, Emilio Herrera-Molina, María Nabal-Vicuña, María Dolores Guerra-Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Connecting communities across the globe: Atlas protocol.Palliative care and social practice · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia Librada-FloresNew Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-6235
María Jesús Pérez-Solano VázquezNew Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Lucas-DíazNew Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.
Zacarías Rodríguez Álvarez-OssorioNew Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.
Emilio Herrera-MolinaNew Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.
María Nabal-VicuñaPalliative Care Team, Arnau de Villanova Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
María Dolores Guerra-MartínDepartment of Nursing, University of Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-1287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate, in a Compassionate City pilot experience (Sevilla), the impact results on health in a population of people with advanced illness and at the end of life.

methodsThe project was undertaken in Sevilla, Spain, between January 2019 and June 2020. A longitudinal, descriptive study was conducted using a longitudinal cohort design with two cross-sectional measurements, pre and post intervention. All patients who entered the program on the start date were included. The networks of care around people with advanced illness and at the end of life, palliative care needs, quality of life, loneliness, anxiety, depression, caregivers' burden and family satisfaction were evaluated. The interventions were conducted by community promoters assigned to the "Sevilla Contigo, Compassionate City" program.

resultsA total of 83 people were included in the program. The average number of people involved in care at the beginning of the evaluations was 3.6, increasing to 6.1 at the end of the interventions. The average number of needs detected at the beginning was 15.58, and at the end of interventions, it was 16.56 out of 25. The unmet needs were those related to last wishes (40.7%), emotional relief (18.5%), entertainment (16%), help to walk up and down stairs (8.6%) and help to walk (6.2%). A total of 54.2% showed improved loneliness in the final evaluation. Out of 26 people evaluated for pre and post quality of life, 7 (26.9%) improved their quality of life in the general evaluation and 5 (19.2%) displayed improved anxiety/depression. A total of 6 people (28.6%) improved their quality-of-life thermometer scores. A total of 57.7% of caregivers improved their burden with a mean score of 17.8.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTerminal CareCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPilot Projectscommunity networkspalliative carepublic health needs assessmentquality of life

Identifiers

PMID36767601
PMCPMC9914945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.