Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767485›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Informed Consent: Legal Obligation or Cornerstone of the Care Relationship?

Margherita Pallocci, Michele Treglia, Pierluigi Passalacqua, Roberta Tittarelli, Claudia Zanovello, Lucilla De Luca, Valentina Caparrelli, Vincenzo De Luna, Alberto Michele Cisterna, Giuseppe Quintavalle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margherita PallocciDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Michele TregliaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9434-2604
Pierluigi PassalacquaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Roberta TittarelliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0561-3442
Claudia ZanovelloDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Lucilla De LucaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5871-6456
Valentina CaparrelliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo De LunaDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, Section of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Alberto Michele CisternaXIII Section, Civil Court of Rome, 00192 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe QuintavalleFondazione Policlinico "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Luigi Tonino MarsellaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topic of informed consent has become increasingly important in recent decades, both in the ethical-deontological field and as a duty of law. The review covered all sentences issued by the 13th section of the Civil Court of Rome during the period January 2016-December 2020. During this period, 156 judgments were found in which a breach of consent was required; in 24 of these, specific liability was proven, and the corresponding compensation liquidated. Moreover, 80% of the cases concerned the lack of information provided. The most involved branches were those related to surgical areas: general surgery, plastic surgery and aesthetic medicine and orthopaedics. The total amount of compensation paid was EUR 287,144.59. The research carried out has highlighted how, in a broad jurisprudential context, the damage caused by the violation of the right related to informed consent is considered, and how it impacts on the economic compensation of damages. Additionally, it showed that the areas most affected by the information deficit are those related to the performance of surgical activities, which are characterized by greater invasiveness and a higher risk of adverse events. The data reported underline the exigency to consider informed consent not as a mere documentary allegation but as an essential moment in the construction of a valid therapeutic alliance, which is also useful for avoiding unnecessary litigation that is becoming increasingly burdensome for healthcare systems all over the world.

Indexed as

MalpracticeOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsInformed ConsentLiability, Legalcommunicationinformed consentlegalliabilitymalpracticemedical errorsphysician–patient relations

Identifiers

PMID36767485
PMCPMC9915667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.