Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767461›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Comparison of Single Target-Controlled Infusion Pump-Delivered Mixed Propofol and Remifentanil with Two Target-Controlled Infusion Pumps-Delivered Propofol and Remifentanil in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery-A Prospective Study.

Hou-Chuan Lai, Meng-Fu Lai, Yi-Hsuan Huang, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Wei-Cheng Tseng, Zhi-Fu Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hou-Chuan LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4295-3208
Meng-Fu LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9765-1824
Yi-Hsuan HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3350-6879
Jyh-Cherng YuDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Wei-Cheng TsengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3528-8633
Zhi-Fu WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-9085
Tri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol (RP) is considered to be an ideal type of general anesthesia (GA) for pediatric and adult patients undergoing medical procedures. However, delivery of an RP mixture by target-controlled infusion (TCI) for GA in surgical procedures has not been described. We investigated the merit of this approach for breast cancer surgery. Eighty-four patients (n = 42 per group) were randomly allocated to propofol and remifentanil either delivered by separate TCI pumps (S group) or in an RP mixture by a single TCI pump (M group). Dosages were adjusted based on the bispectral index (BIS) and the analgesia nociception index (ANI). The primary outcomes were adequate anesthesia (BIS 40-60 and ANI 50-70, respectively), acceptable hemodynamic fluctuations (<30% of baseline) with less frequent TCI pump adjustments, bolus injections of anesthetics, and total consumption of anesthetics during the procedure. The secondary endpoints included time of emergence from anesthesia, patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, rescue with opioids, and adverse events. The characteristics of patients, hemodynamic parameters, BIS and ANI scores, duration of surgery, anesthesia, and emergence were not significantly different between groups. The adjustment frequency of TCI was significantly higher in the S group (3 (range 0-6) vs. 2 (0-6) times;

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPropofolAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousChildFemaleHumansInfusion PumpsPiperidinesProspective StudiesRemifentanilAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, IntravenousPiperidinesPropofolRemifentanilbreast cancer surgerypropofolremifentaniltotal intravenous anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID36767461
PMCPMC9915350
OpenAlexW4317821424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.