Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767453›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Assistive Products and Technology to Facilitate Activities and Participation for Children with Disabilities.

Johanne Mensah-Gourmel, Margot Thépot, Jan Willem Gorter, Maxime Bourgain, Christèle Kandalaft, Alain Chatelin, Guy Letellier, Sylvain Brochard, Christelle Pons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johanne Mensah-GourmelPhysical Medecine and Rehabilitation Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Margot ThépotPhysical Medecine and Rehabilitation Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Jan Willem GorterCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-2119
Maxime BourgainArts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-4858
Christèle KandalaftIndependent Researcher, 75013 Paris, France.
Alain ChatelinFondation Paralysie Cérébrale, 75013 Paris, France.
Guy LetellierPediatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Etablissement de Santé pour Enfants et Adolescents de la région Nantaise-APF France Handicap, 44200 Nantes, France.
Sylvain BrochardPhysical Medecine and Rehabilitation Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Brest, 29200 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4950-1696
Christelle PonsPhysical Medecine and Rehabilitation Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Brest, 29200 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-6035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to identify activity limitations and participation restrictions encountered by children and youth with disabilities for which assistive products and technology could be helpful. We used a convergent, parallel, mixed-methods design involving a nationwide, French survey composed of closed questions (quantitative) and open questions (qualitative) that enlightened the quantitative data. A total of 1055 responses were received, and 962 included: 92 from children and youth with disabilities, 493 from relatives and 377 from professionals. Difficulties frequently checked and described in detail were participation in recreational activities, leaving the house and traveling, participating in a group, and getting ready. Transversal explanations for difficulties were spontaneously provided (e.g., lack of accessibility and mobility). Solutions proposed included personal assistive devices to facilitate home life, high-tech devices, devices to compensate for impaired body functions, and adaptation of the familiar environment and daily activities. Few public solutions were proposed. The necessity of human assistance was emphasized. The mixed-methods design and involvement of different stakeholders identified common, macroscopic trends in difficulties encountered and desired solutions. Products and technology are required in the following domains: the familiar environment, accessibility and mobility, sports and leisure, high-technology, and family support. We provide suggestions to facilitate the development of innovative solutions.

Indexed as

Children with DisabilitiesPersons with DisabilitiesSelf-Help DevicesAdolescentChildFamily SupportHumansSurveys and Questionnairesassistive products and technologychildrendaily lifeneedsparticipationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36767453
PMCPMC9915405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.