Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767274›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Chemical Profiles and Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes: An Umbrella Review and Methodological Considerations.

Nargiz Travis, Marie Knoll, Steven Cook, Hayoung Oh, Christopher J Cadham, Luz María Sánchez-Romero, David T Levy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Exposure to Toxic Compounds Using Alternative Smoking Products: Analysis of Empirical Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Salivary Metabolic Pathway Alterations in Brazilian E-Cigarette Users.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nargiz TravisLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-8259
Marie KnollLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Steven CookDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6363-2940
Hayoung OhLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Christopher J CadhamDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9531-2733
Luz María Sánchez-RomeroLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
David T LevyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-3612

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Abigail S. Friedman · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic cigarettes (ECs) are often marketed as a safer alternative to combustible tobacco products. The global EC market has rapidly expanded since their introduction, creating an urgent need for research describing the toxicity and chemical composition of ECs. We conducted an umbrella review to summarize the evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs).

methodsThe search for SRs was conducted across four electronic databases through 25 January 2022. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal tool.

resultsTwenty-five SRs were included in our umbrella review. Chemical profiles widely varied across studies included in the reviews, which was mainly attributed to the lack of standardized protocols investigating the constituents, and differences in EC devices and e-liquids tested. Metals were more abundant in some EC aerosols than cigarettes, while carbonyls were typically found at lower levels. There was consistent evidence of in vitro toxicity from EC aerosol and e-liquid exposure. AMSTAR-2 revealed important limitations across reviews.

conclusionsWhile most reviews concluded that ECs were likely less harmful than cigarettes, there was hesitancy to draw clear conclusions due to variable analytical procedures and inconsistent findings among the included studies. Future SRs with improved methodology and reporting are needed to adequately inform tobacco regulatory actions.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsMetalsAerosolsMetalschemical profilesconstituentselectronic cigarettestoxicityumbrella reviewvaping

Identifiers

PMID36767274
PMCPMC9914618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.