Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36767122›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Preventing Stress among High School Students in Denmark through the Multicomponent Healthy High School Intervention-The Effectiveness at First Follow-Up.

Camilla Thørring Bonnesen, Lau Caspar Thygesen, Naja Hulvej Rod, Mette Toftager, Katrine Rich Madsen, Marie Pil Jensen, Johanne Aviaja Rosing, Stine Kjær Wehner, Pernille Due, Rikke Fredenslund Krølner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Camilla Thørring BonnesenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2807-6712
Lau Caspar ThygesenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8375-5211
Naja Hulvej RodSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette ToftagerDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6736-3725
Katrine Rich MadsenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6591-9849
Marie Pil JensenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johanne Aviaja RosingNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stine Kjær WehnerNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7906-2575
Pernille DueNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rikke Fredenslund KrølnerNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4928-4310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress is a widespread phenomenon and young people especially are experiencing high levels of stress. School-related factors are the most frequently self-reported stressors among adolescents, but few interventions have targeted the school environment. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Healthy High School (HHS) intervention on stress at a 9-month follow-up. The study included 5201 first-year high school students (~16 years) in Denmark. Participating schools were randomized into the HHS intervention (N = 15) or control group (N = 15). Baseline measurements were conducted in August 2016 and the follow-up was conducted in May 2017. The intervention was designed to promote well-being (primary outcome) by focusing on physical activity, meals, sleep, sense of security, and stress (secondary outcomes). The intervention comprised: structural initiatives at the school level; a teaching material; peer-led innovation workshops; and a smartphone app. The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale was used to measure stress. Intervention effects on perceived stress were estimated using an intention-to-treat approach with multiple imputations of missing data and multilevel general linear regression modelling. A total of 4577 students answered the baseline questionnaire. No statistically significant difference was found in stress between students at intervention and control schools at the follow-up (mean score: 16.7 versus 16.7, adjusted b = 0.42, 95% CI: -0.16;1.00). The HHS Study is one of the first large randomized controlled trials targeting school environmental stressors. Potential implementation failures and the failures of the program theory are discussed.

Indexed as

ExerciseSchoolsAdolescentDenmarkFollow-Up StudiesHumansSchool Health ServicesStudentseffectivenesshigh schoolschool-based interventionstress

Identifiers

PMID36767122
PMCPMC9914335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.